Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Reuss

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1986PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leon D. Lazer, that plaintiff is not entitled to enforce his attorney’s charging lien on the proceeds of the life insurance policy. Although plaintiff was not required to assert a counterclaim in prior litigation, by otherwise failing to timely assert the *695lien within a reasonable time after it attached, plaintiff waived his right to enforce the lien as a matter of law (see, Todd v Mutual Factors, 3 AD2d 537, 546, affd 4 NY2d 759).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Todd v. Mutual Factors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Litman v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Chadbourne & Parke, LLP v. AB Recur FinansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Harley & Browne v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Haser v. HaserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API