Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Reuss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1985PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lazer, J. P.

Plaintiff is an attorney who has asserted a charging lien which he seeks to enforce against the proceeds of an insurance policy on the life of Archimedes Cervera. The policy, with a face amount of $250,000, had been purchased by Tele-Signal Corp. pursuant to employment and shareholders’ agreements with Mr. Cervera and had been authorized by corporate resolution as well. Tele-Signal was the named beneficiary. Following Mr. Cervera’s death, plaintiff’s law firm was re*185tained by Tele-Signal to obtain the proceeds of the policy after the insurer refused payment.

Plain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Matter of HeinsheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Litman v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz, Damashek & Shoot v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Chadbourne & Parke, LLP v. AB Recur FinansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Harley & Browne v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Haser v. HaserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API