Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Morris
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From Yamhill: Percy R. Kelly, Judge. This is an action by C. F. Daniels and W. J. Bishop, partners in business under the firm name and style of Daniels & Bishop, against M. L. Morris and E. L. Morris. There was a judgment for plaintiffs and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin
On April 1, 1910, C. F. Daniels and the defendants entered into a contract by which the defendants agreed *291to grow and sell to plaintiff Daniels 20,000 pounds of prime hops, and Daniels agreed to purchase the same at $.16 per pound; the contract in so far as involved here being as follows:
“That said seller * * does hereby agree to sell and deliver to the buyers * * twenty thousand (20,000) pounds of hops. * * And to deliver the said hops in said year at the McMinnville depot * * at such time between the 1st and 31st days of October of said year as the buyers may direct. Bach bale of said hops…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Call v. LinnOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Humphrey v. SagouspeNevada Supreme Court · 1927
- Wigan v. FollettOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Hugo v. Loewi, Inc. v. GeschwillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Otto Seidenberg, Inc. v. TautfestOregon Supreme Court · 1937