Legal Opinion

Spicknall v. Panhandle State Bank of Borger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1954No. 6390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTS, Chief Justice.

In this suit-appellant, Dee Spicknall, sued for damages, alleging as a party plaintiff the withholding from him of a second or junior chattel mortgage by appellee, Eugene E. Piper, acting for himself and as agent and attorney for appellee, Panhandle State Bank of Borger, Texas, both as party defendants, until the property described in the said mortgage had been sold to satisfy the first or prior mortgage lien, all of which is denied by appellees. Appellant contends that the suit is one in the nature of conversion, yet he makes no claim of any conversion of the property…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The Texas Loan Agency v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoruaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Gulf, C. S. F. R. Co. v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Michaelis v. NanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. BetancourtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Jeff Kaiser, P.C. and Jeffery Benedict Kaiser, A/K/A Jeffrey B. Kaiser v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API