Legal Opinion
The Texas Loan Agency v. Taylor
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1895No. 223PublishedCited by 47 opinions
Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fifth District, in an appeal from Fannin County.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
—This suit was brought by Robert H. Taylor, Jr., Callie Taylor, Louisa Noble, and Mattie Gooch, to recover an undivided half interest in certain tracts of land alleged to be the community property of their father and mother, Robert H. Taylor and Tennessee Taylor. Louisa Noble and Mattie Gooch were married women, and were joined pro forma by their husbands. It was alleged, that Tennessee Taylor was the wife of Robert H. Taylor; that the lands were acquired during the existence of their marital union; that Tennessee Taylor died in the year 1867; and that R. H. Taylor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kauffman & Runge v. RobeyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Irvine v. GradyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- McAlpine v. BurnettTexas Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by47 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. DunlapSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Carl v. SettegastTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Teagarden v. R. B. Godley Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
- Pan Eastern Exploration Co. v. Hufo OilsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. BelcherTexas Supreme Court · 1895
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.