Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Morua

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 27, 1944No. 2610PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Chief Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Herminie Valdez Morua, joined by her husband, and Esther Valdez, a minor, brought this suit for death benefits because of the death of their father, Alfredo R. Valdez, who, they alleged, died of heat exhaustion at The Texas Company’s plant in Port Arthur, Texas, on June 12, 1942. Based on the findings of the jury, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs, and defendant has appealed.

By its first group of points appellant takes the position that there is no admissible evidence of probative force in this record raising the issue that heat…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Barrington v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Wininger v. Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Watson v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Robertson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Stuckey v. Union Mortgage & Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API