Legal Opinion

Chia Chuen Su v. Weaver

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 18, 1988No. 64, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKWELL, Judge.

There are two issues presented in this medical malpractice case. First, we hold that the trial court improperly admitted hearsay testimony concerning an ultimate issue, thus rendering the verdict unreliable. We therefore remand for a new trial. Second, in an action to nullify a Health Claims Arbitration Panel’s decision, the award is presented to the jury, but an explanatory opinion is not admissible. However in this case, where the opinion had specific findings which were not included in the award, the jury should have been advised of those conclusions. We summarize the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KuhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Sun Cab Co. v. WalstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crane v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Orkin v. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Carroll v. KonitsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Kearney v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Crawford v. LeahyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API