Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kuhl
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
The questions presented in this case are whether a conviction for assault and battery is admissible in a subsequent civil action to assert the facts arising out of the same incident and whether a signed written statement given to police in the criminal action and testimony of a police officer as to the statement are admissible in the civil action when the person who made the statement does not testify.
The parties submitted the case to the Court of Special Appeals on an agreed statement of the facts from which we distill the following events and facts to place these issues in proper focus.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Montgomery v. CrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Eisenhower v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Fraidin v. WeitzmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Castiglione v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Popham v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.