Legal Opinion

Crane v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 26, 2004No. 109, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

“In Maryland, a guilty plea to a traffic citation is admissible in a civil trial; its probative value is deemed to outweigh any prejudicial effect. An express acknowledgment of guilt to the charged offense in open court is far more probative than a questionable acknowledgment of culpability that might be inferred from paying a preset fine in lieu of going to court.” Briggeman v. Albert, 322 Md. 133, 139, 586 A.2d 15, 18 (1991).

In this case we must decide whether the trial judge correctly excluded evidence of a party’s guilty plea, in traffic court, to the charge of negligent driving when that…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Ex Rel. CastrandaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Flores v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Brown v. Daniel Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Perry v. Asphalt & Concrete Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Barksdale v. WilkowskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API