Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Ahlgren

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2011No. DA 10-0562PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Appellants James Hughes and Rhea Hughes (collectively Hughes) appeal from an order of the Tenth Judicial District Court, Fergus County, that awarded attorney fees to Appellees Dorothea, John, and Connie Ahlgren (collectively Ahlgren) in a declaratoryjudgment action involving a dispute over an easement.

¶2 We review the following issue on appeal:

¶3 Whether the District Court properly awarded Ahlgren’s attorney fees in a declaratory judgment action involving a dispute over an easement.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶4 Ahlgren and Hughes own neighboring ranches in Fergus County, Montana. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trustees of Indiana University v. BuxbaumMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United National Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sampson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mungas v. Great Falls Clinic, LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Renville v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Helena v. SveeMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Wohl v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Montana Immigrant Justice Alliance v. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Hurly v. Lake Cabin Development, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API