Legal Opinion
JC Penney v. Lane
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 26, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 99-0095PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
¶ 1 Two issues are presented in this appeal and cross appeal: (1) Because of amendments to Rule 77(g), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 9(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, did the trial court lack discretion under the facts presented to vacate and reenter an order pursuant to Rule 60(c)(6), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, to allow an appeal that otherwise would have been untimely? (2) Assuming that we uphold the decision to vacate and reenter the order, did the trial court err in determining that pursuant to its interpretation of relevant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- John Curtis Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Jackson Tool & Die, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Ward v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Lachter v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Fidelity National Financial Inc. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Fidelity National Financial, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.