Weltsch v. O'BRIEN
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
The sole issue to be determined on this appeal is the validity of a renewal of a judgment under A.R.S. § 12-1612.
This issue arose out of a suit brought by plaintiffs-appellees Alan T. O’Brien and Barbara O’Brien, against defendant-appellant Julian F. Weltsch, for wrongful garnishment. The trial court, on cross motions for summary judgment, entered'judgment on liability only in favor of the plaintiffs and after appropriate findings under Rule 54(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., the defendant has appealed.
The facts giving rise to this litigation are not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fay v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- McBride v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- JC Penney v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- United Bank v. Sun Valley Door & Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Goldfield Mines, Inc. v. HandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Fidelity National Financial, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.