Legal Opinion

Crooker v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 13, 1958No. 178PublishedCited by 520 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Petitioner, under sentence of death for the murder of his paramour, claims that his conviction in a California court violates Fourteenth Amendment due process of law because (1) the confession admitted into evidence over his objection had been coerced from him by state authorities, and (2) even if his confession was voluntary it occurred while he was without counsel because of the previous denial of his request therefor. The Supreme Court of California affirmed the conviction. 47 Cal. 2d 348, 303 P. 2d 753. Certiorari was granted because of the serious due process implications that attend…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by520 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

515 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API