Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smallwood v. Windom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1915No. Nos. 19,563—(22)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Upon the relation of William H. Smallwood this court granted its writ of quo warranto directed to William L. Windom. Eespondent filed his answer and prayed that the writ be discharged and the state by the attorney general and the relator filed a reply to the answer of respondent. A referee was appointed and the testimony taken before him was returned to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

Quo warranto on the relation of William H. Smallwood to try the title of respondent William L. Windom to the office of municipal judge of Duluth.

The proceeding is original in this court. Evidence has been taken and is before us.

The respondent, Judge Windom, was elected municipal judge in February, 1912, for a term of, three years, and until his successor was elected and qualified. In 1913, the municipal court act was amended so that it provided for a four-year term, and further, that the then incumbent should continue in office until the election which was to be held on the first…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. TiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. People Ex Rel. Fowler v. BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Crovatt v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Kimberlin v. State ex rel. TowIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Enger v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Stephenson v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  3. Van Cleve v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. González v. Corte de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
  5. State v. IrbyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API