Legal Opinion

Hogue v. National Automotive Parts Ass'n

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 29, 1949No. 6768PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOSCINSKI, District Judge.

Plaintiff had verdict for unpaid wages and overtime under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

Defendant moved to set aside verdict and enter judgment non obstante, or, in the alternative, for new trial, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 50(b), 28 U.S.C.A. The court previously reserved its decision on defendant’s motion to direct verdict made at close of plaintiff’s evidence and also at close of all the evidence.

Defendant is a non-profit corporation engaged in gathering and compiling statistical reports and other data…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. McCloskey & Co. v. EckartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  3. Block Coal & Coke Co. v. United Mine WorkersTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  5. Burns v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jimmy Roberts v. Browning D/B/A Browning, Inc. Of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  2. Maynard v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Seidle v. Turner (In re 18th Avenue Development Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1981
  4. Durkin v. ShoneDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  5. La-Z-Boy Chair Co. v. HindsDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API