Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Durham & Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1961No. 183PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioner, an employee of respondent, sued in a North Carolina court for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U. S. C. § 51. As a defense, respondent tendered a release signed by petitioner and moved for a nonsuit. The motion was allowed after all the evidence was in, and the Supreme Court of North Carolina *161affirmed, one judge dissenting. 251 N. C. 783, 112 S. E. 2d 249.

We said in Dice v. Akron, C. & Y. R. Co., 342 U. S. 359, 361, that the “validity of releases under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act raises a federal question to be determined by federal rather than state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Burns v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Hogue v. National Automotive Parts Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1949
  5. Maynard v. DURHAM AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Salmeron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Louis E. FULGENCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Jimmy Roberts v. Browning D/B/A Browning, Inc. Of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  5. Wicker v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API