Legal Opinion

State v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 9, 1939No. 74PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

While the plaintiff has contended that the check for $23,958.52 was not received by it under binding circum*278stances and has brought suit for the full amount of $25,-219.49, yet we think the present controversy should not , include the amount of the check. The check was received by the plaintiff and deposited to a special account entirely in the name of the plaintiff, and as to which account the plaintiff had exclusive control. The identification of the account was purely for the plaintiff’s purposes. We shall therefore consider the suit as merely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clayton v. ClarkMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Sawyer v. Somers Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Frye v. HubbellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  4. Moss v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Ashland Coal & Coke Co. v. Old Ben Coal Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Baillie Lumber Co. v. Kincaid Carolina Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. WSMW Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Kellogg v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. Superior Tube Co. v. Delaware Aircraft Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API