Legal Opinion

La-Z-Boy Chair Co. v. Hinds

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 8, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 73-572PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, insisting that no genuine issue of fact exists as a matter of law. The original complaint alleges the sale of merchandise to defendant in the amount of Fifty Thousand Seventy-Eight and 39/100 ($50,078.39) Dollars; attached to the complaint is a statement of account. The answer of the defendant alleges that he returned ninety (90) chairs and the acceptance by the plaintiff of these ninety (90) chairs, previously shipped to the defendant by the plaintiff, was in accord…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whiting Stoker Co. v. Chicago Stoker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  2. Fleming v. PostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Reliance Varnish Co. v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
  5. Redmond v. StrangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosa v. JohnstonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API