Legal Opinion
David E. Blakeman and Harold D. Keeble v. Mead Containers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1985No. 85-5001PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, a group of defendant’s former employees, appeal from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Mead Containers on plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 et seq. and state law. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I
On August 17, 1983, plaintiffs David E. Blakeman and Harold D. Keeble filed a complaint “on behalf of all other persons similarly situated who were former salaried employees of the Defendant Corporation, not covered by a collective bargaining agreement” pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132 and state law.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- LeDuc v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Taft Broadcasting Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- George Straub v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company Virgil E. Arrington v. James A. NeusserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.