Legal Opinion
Richers v. Marsh & McLennan Group Associates
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided July 18, 1990No. 89-1164PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
The issues on this appeal arise from a ruling on a motion to disqualify opposing attorneys. In the action plaintiff Sue Rich-ers made claims against her former employer, Marsh & McLennan Group Associates (MMGA), and two officers of MMGA, James Sourbeer and Joseph Piper, stemming from the termination of her employment with that insurance brokerage firm. Plaintiff is represented by Alanson Elgar of the Elgar Law Firm and Patrick M. Roby of Shuttleworth & Ingersoll, P.C. (Shuttleworth). Defendants moved to disqualify plaintiffs attorneys due to an alleged conflict of interest…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Best v. YerkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Fred Weber, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company, Shell Pipe Line Corporation, Amoco Oil Company and Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Kraft, Inc. v. Alton Box Board Co., and Container Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- State of Arkansas, Cross-Appellant v. Dean Foods Products Company, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- State v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bottoms v. StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- State v. LaRueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Perry Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Nachazel v. Mira Co., Mfg.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.