Legal Opinion

Trigg v. City of Yuma

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1942No. Civil No. 4462PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— This action was brought by C. H. Trigg and Lena Trigg, husband and wife, to quiet their title to “a strip of land forty (40) feet in width off the rear of Lots One (1) and Two (2) of Block Ninety-five (95) of the City of Yuma.”

The defendants, the City of Yuma and Pama E. Townsend, filed a joint answer to such complaint in which it is alleged that the city taxes on said property for the years 1932-1937, respectively, were:

1932 ..............................$ 8.50

1933 .............................. 8.50

1934 .............................. 8.50

1935 .............................. 6.45

1936…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Bowls v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Barrett v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Morris v. Board of Com'rs of Love CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Tucson Sunshine Climate ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. City of Phoenix v. Arizona Sash, Door & Glass Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. RandallArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City of Phoenix v. EliasArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  5. City of Yuma v. LattieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API