Legal Opinion

City of Yuma v. Lattie

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 6, 1977No. 1 CA-CIV 3019PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

This is an appeal by the city of Yuma from a jury verdict in favor of the appellee, who brought an inverse eminent domain action for damages to her real property. The damages were the result of street improvements constructed as a part of a special assessment district. Specifically, appellee’s claims for damages were for the impairment of her ingress and egress and from the increase in the probability of flooding to her property resulting from a change in the grade of a street.

The facts are that appellee was the owner of Lot 13 and the south half of Lot 14, of the Los…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY, ETC. v. CannonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re ForsstromArizona Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. City of Phoenix v. GarretsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Meadows v. MeadowsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  5. Triple G v. MohaveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API