Legal Opinion

Barrett v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1934No. Criminal No. 814PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

J. H. Barrett, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of selling beer in violation of Ordinance 714 of the City of Tucson, and has appealed. The case is before us on an agreed statement of facts, the material portions of which read as follows :

“That at all times mentioned therein the defendant J. H. Barrett, was operating a restaurant as an employee of P. C. Howell, who was the owner of a lease on said premises at 41 South Stone Avenue, Tucson, Arizona, as aforesaid, and at all times the said R. C. Howell did have issued to him a restaurant license to sell liquors for consumption on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In re KinzelNew York Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flagstaff Vending Co. v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of Phoenix v. Arizona Sash, Door & Glass Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Mayor Common Council of City of Prescott v. RandallArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Trigg v. City of YumaArizona Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API