Legal Opinion

Landreth v. Ducommun

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1935No. Civ. 10290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

Judgment was entered in the trial court in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant gave notice of appeal but did not prepare the recoz’d for use upon the appeal within the time prescribed by law. Thereafter and on August 1st, 1934, the court granted a motion of the plaintiff to terminate proceedings for preparation of the transcript on'appeal. Thereafter and within the time prescribed by law, upon the application of defendant for relief under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court made an order relieving the defendant from his default in failing to serve a draft of the proposed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Callahan v. HarmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. McWilliams v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Buis v. Lindauer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hixson v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Lande v. Southern California Freight LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Hohnemann v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Landreth v. DucommunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API