Legal Opinion
Schuster v. Dacey
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided June 9, 2008No. SUCV200700617PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Troy, Paul E., J.
The plaintiff, Margaret Schuster (Schuster), claims that the defendants solicited investment deposits, invested her funds in securities that were high risk — despite her conservative investment objectives — and acted in concert to defraud her and conceal the riskiness of the investments. The complaint alleges the following: common law fraud — count I; breach of fiduciary duty — count II; breach of contract — count III; negligence — count IV; violation of Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (R.I.C.O.) — countV; violation of G.L.c. 93A — count VI; violation of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- New England Data Services, Inc. v. Barry BecherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Friedman v. JablonskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- II Palazzo Corp. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009