Legal Opinion

State v. Shutt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 31, 1976No. 7290 and 7466PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

The defendant in each of these cases was convicted in the Nashua District Court of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1975). Substantially identical issues of law were raised by defendants’ exceptions to the denial of their motions to suppress, and defendants’ exceptions were reserved and transferred by the District Judge, Hathaway, J.

The defendants in both cases argue that the results of breathalyzer tests administered to the defendants should have been suppressed because the State failed to preserve the ampoules used in the tests.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. HitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  3. State v. DickensNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. State v. StandishSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. State v. DuketteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CanadayWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Scales v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. State v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  5. State v. HelmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API