Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1995No. 357PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*219CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This appeal is from the court’s order allowing appellee, an uninsured pedestrian, to recover uninsured motorist benefits for injuries she sustained as the result of a hit and run accident. Appellee was struck by an insured vehicle which had been stolen. The parties stipulated that the vehicle was being driven without the insured’s consent. For the reasons that follow we reverse.

Appellee was struck by a vehicle bearing license tag number WRK-670 at the intersection of 19th Street and Lehigh Avenue on the afternoon of October 21, 1991. Appellee testified that the vehicle was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. CummingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. FalliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Ector v. Motorists Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Pempkowski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Kromer v. Reliance InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ShearsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Allstate Insurance v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API