Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Cummings

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1994PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this opinion, we are called upon to determine whether a “non-permissive use” exclusion in an automobile insurance policy contravenes the legislative intent of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, and is against public policy, where the injured party is an uninsured passenger who has no knowledge of the fact he is occupying a stolen vehicle. We hold that the exclusion is valid and in accordance with public policy, and affirm the judgment entered by the trial court.

The pertinent facts and procedural history of this case are as follows. On May 17, 1987, appellant, who…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc. v. Siemens Capital Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Authority of Cambria County v. International Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Williams v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Schultz v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Pressley v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API