Legal Opinion

Pempkowski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 1996PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, President Judge.

This appeal has been taken by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from the entry of summary judgment in favor of appellees, Stella and Frank Pempkowski, in this declaratory judgment action instituted by appellees to determine whether appellant, State Farm, was obligated to provide uninsured motorist benefits to Stella Pempkowski, a class-one insured 1 under the policy issued to appellees, Stella and Frank Pempkowski, by State Farm, where appellees had already collected the limits of the liability coverage provided under the policy. We find that State Farm…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Community College v. Community College, Society of the FacultySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, H/w Patsy Dezii William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, Patsy DeziiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Bowersox v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Estate of O'Connell ex rel. O'Connell v. Progressive Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. MurakamiColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API