Legal Opinion

Shepard Et Ux. v. Purvine

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1952PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment, brought by Ralph C. Shepard and Lela A. Shepard, his wife, as plaintiffs, against B. J. Purvine and Lenore Purvine, his wife, W. R. Purvine and Paula Purvine, his wife, and Margaret Purvine, as defendants, wherein plaintiffs seek to establish a right of way for a pipe line to pipe water from a spring on defendants’ lands to the property of plaintiffs and to establish a water right to a portion of the water rising in said spring. Plaintiffs also seek injunctive relief. A decree was entered in favor of defendants and dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hallock v. SuitorOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Baum Et Ux v. DennOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Ewing v. RheaOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Heisley v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In Re Estate of RosenbergOregon Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. LUCKEY ET UX v. DeatsmanOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Goldthwaite v. Sheraton RestaurantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. King v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API