Legal Opinion

Hallock v. Suitor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1900PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Polk : Henry H. Hewitt, Judge. Suit by Mary E. Hallock against Robert Suitor for an injunction. Decree for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

delivered, the opinion.

This is a suit to enjoin the defendant from maintaining and operating a dam constructed by him on plaintiff’s premises in Polk County, and to restrain him from interfering with a water power thereon. It appears that La Creole Creek flows in an easterly direction through said premises, and empties into the Willamette River. The land drained by the headwaters thereof is covered with valuable timber, which, cut into saw logs and put into the creek, can only be floated therein in its natural stage during the wintér freshets ; but by means of dams provided with sluiceways of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Garrett v. BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Haines v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Shaw v. Oswego Iron Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1882
  5. McBroom v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. LUCKEY ET UX v. DeatsmanOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Brown v. Gold Coin Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. McPhee v. KelseyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ewing v. RheaOregon Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API