Legal Opinion
Wilson v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 3, 1995No. 86 C 2360PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Andrew Wilson brings this action for damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against Jon Burge, Patrick O’Hara and John Yucaitis (the “Officers”), alleging that they tortured him to force him to confess to the murder of two Chicago police officers. In his Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff added the City of Chicago (the “City”), alleging that the City is liable, pursuant to the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act, 745 ILCS 10/9-102 (“the Tort Immunity Act”), for any judgment or settlement…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Codest Engineering v. Hyatt International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees v. Substance, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Powell v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Banks v. Chicago Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.