Legal Opinion
Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees v. Substance, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 4, 2000No. 99 C 440PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees and Third-Party Defendant Paul Valias move to dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint and to strike three of Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses. For the following reasons, the court grants the motion.
I. Background 1
The Illinois Common Schools Act empowers the Plaintiff in this case, the Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees (“the Board”), to develop and administer educational level tests. See 105 ILCS §§ 5/34-2.4, 5/34-3.3. Pursuant to this authority, the Board developed the 1998…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salaita v. KennedyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Association of American Medical Colleges v. Princeton Review, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Forgue v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- John Kraft v. County of Shelby & Tad MayhallDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025
- Kraft v. Shelby County IllinoisDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.