Legal Opinion

Codest Engineering v. Hyatt International Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 23, 1996No. 94 C 7335PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COAR, District Judge.

Before the court are two motions by plaintiff Codest Engineering (“Codest”). In its first motion, Codest moves to strike each of defendant Hyatt International Corporation’s (“Hyatt”) affirmative defenses, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). Cod-est also moves to dismiss Hyatt’s counterclaim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s affirmative defenses is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Michael C. Antonelli v. Michael F. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. LaSalle Bank Nat'l Assoc. v. Paramont PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  2. Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  3. Blihovde v. St. Croix CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2003
  4. Reis Robotics USA, Inc. v. Concept Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  5. Renalds v. S.R.G. Restaurant GroupDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API