Legal Opinion
Banks v. Chicago Housing Authority
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 30, 1998No. 96 C 1236PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary Banks, formerly employed as a crossing guard by the Chicago Police Department, has filed a second amended complaint against the Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”) and four of its police officers (collectively “defendants”). Plaintiff asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants violated her civil rights by: (1) using excessive force; (2) failing to prevent a civil rights violation; and (3) failing to provide medical assistance. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all three of plaintiffs claims. 1…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roberts v. Board of Education, Hazel Crest School District No. 152½District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Cosey v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Roberts v. BOARD OF EDUC.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999