Legal Opinion

Inmates' Councilmatic Voice, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. David Rogers, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1976No. 75-2363 and 75-2364PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of a three-judge District Court holding unconstitutional the procedures of the Ohio Adult Parole Authority (APA) promulgated pursuant to Chapters 2967 and 5149 of the Ohio Revised Code and as applied to parole revocation. 1 The three-judge District Court held that these procedures violated the due process rights of parolees enunciated in Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972) and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973).

The District Court adopted certain procedures stipulated by the parties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mitchell v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Don B. Cook v. United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Samuel J. Britton, Warden U.S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taylor v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CozzoneOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Mitchell Sneed v. David DonahueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Moore v. HofbauerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  5. William Lee Moss v. S. M. Patterson, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API