Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Taylor v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1993No. 92-1205PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

For the following reasons, we overrule Taylor’s motion for default judgment (see Civ.R. 55[D]) and summary judgment, and grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, petitioner’s request for writs of mandamus or habeas corpus is denied.

I

Taylor first argues that he was entitled to a final parole revocation hearing within sixty days at the latest after his November 7, 1991 conviction for the new offense. In Morrissey v. Brewer (1972), 408 U.S. 471, at 488, 92 S.Ct. 2593, at 2603-2604, 33 L.Ed.2d 484, at 498, the Supreme Court, applying due process analysis, held that a parole…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Robert Michael Hanahan v. Dennis M. Luther, Warden and William Pilcher, Chief Probation OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Oscar Cornelius Goodman v. Thomas F. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Inmates' Councilmatic Voice, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. David Rogers, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. CozzoneOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. CalhounOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Marsh v. Tibbals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API