Wigmore v. Buell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County refusing to dissolve an attachment. W. B. Cope, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment issued in favor of plaintiff in an action brought under the act entitled, “An act concerning trespassing animals upon private lands in certain counties of the state of California,” approved March 7, 1878. (Stats. 1878, p. 176.) The appeal is here by bill of exceptions, which contains the complaint, writ of attachment, undertaking on attachment, motion to dissolve attachment, order of refusal, and notice of appeal.
The complaint avers that plaintiff is the owner and was in the lawful possession of certain land in Santa Barbara…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brodhead v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Wilcox v. HemmingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Selowsky v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- People v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Ex Parte ElamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Fall Creek Sheep Co. v. WaltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Hutchinson v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.