Jewell v. United States. Thoman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
These two cases were argued together as they present identical questions of law based upon closely similar situations of fact. In each case after registration under the Selective Service Act, the appellant was classified by the Local Board as a conscientious objector. The Appeal Board made the same classification. In each case the appellant claimed to be entitled to exemption as a minister of Jehovah’s Witnesses and requested an appeal to the President. In each case the National Selective Service Appeal Board, without stating any reason or making any findings of fact, placed the appellant in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Taffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Bejelis v. United States. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. JewellDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Elmer B. Wiggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. HagamanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Pine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.