Legal Opinion
Forastiere v. Springfield Institution For Savings
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 25, 1939PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
One Gamari and his wife had a joint deposit in the defendant bank, amounting to $935.99, represented by the usual savings bank book. He and his wife owed the defendant bank $3,800 upon a joint and several note dated September 4, 1908, payable on demand to the defendant at its banking house, and secured by a mortgage of real estate. The note was due immediately, without actual *102demand. Farmers National Bank of Annapolis v. Venner, 192 Mass. 531, 534, 535. Goodfellow v. Farnham, 239 Mass. 590, 591. His wife died, leaving him the sole owner of the deposit, and individually liable upon the note.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- National Mahaiwe Bank v. PeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Spaulding v. BackusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Nineteenth Ward Bank v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Bowling Green, Inc. v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- In Re Saugus General Hospital, Inc., Debtor. Philip L. Sisk, Receiver of Saugus General Hospital v. Saugus Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Jensen v. State Bank of AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.