Legal Opinion
King v. Bell
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided September 27, 2005No. 1:00-0017PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ECHOLS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Petitioner, Tommy King (“King”). 1 (Docket Entry No. 26.) Respondent, Warden Ricky Bell (“the State”), filed an Answer to the Petition (Docket Entry No. 49) and later filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 53), to which King responded in opposition.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Petition, the Answer, and the voluminous state court record, as well as the pleadings and exhibits the parties filed in support of and in opposition to the pending…
2Cases cited113 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Nichols v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Hernandez v. GenoveseDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.