Loving v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge GIERKE
delivered the opinion of the Court.
I. INTRODUCTION
Senior Judge Robinson O. Everett, writing for this Court, once quoted the fundamental *134legal maxim, ‘“Always salt down the facts first; the law will keep.’ ”1 He reaffirmed this point with this intuitive observation, “ ‘In the very nature of things, it is impossible for a court to enter a valid judgment declaring the rights of parties to litigation until the facts on which those rights depend have been “salted down” in a manner sanctioned by law.’ ”2 Although we address several issues here, the pivotal issue is whether this…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Denedo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. LaBellaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- Armann v. McKeanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Private E1 RONALD GRAYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.