Nichols v. Bell
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EDGAR, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND................................................739
A. Facts at Trial Level....................................................739
B. Facts Introduced During the State Post-Conviction Hearing................741
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ...........................................748
III. STANDARDS OF REVIEW................................................752
A. Habeas Claims Cognizable Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ........................752
B. Review of Habeas Claims on the Merit...................................752
C. Factual…
2Cases cited179 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harold Wayne Nichols v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Sutton v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Harold Wayne Nichols v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Moscoso v. Warden Southeastern Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019