Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Bell

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 25, 2006No. 1:02 CV 330PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EDGAR, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND................................................739

A. Facts at Trial Level....................................................739

B. Facts Introduced During the State Post-Conviction Hearing................741

II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ...........................................748

III. STANDARDS OF REVIEW................................................752

A. Habeas Claims Cognizable Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ........................752

B. Review of Habeas Claims on the Merit...................................752

C. Factual…

2Cases cited179 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harold Wayne Nichols v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Sutton v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010
  3. Harold Wayne Nichols v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. Moscoso v. Warden Southeastern Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API