Legal Opinion
Technograph, Inc. v. Texas Instruments Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 29, 1967No. 67 Civ. 3166PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved (1) pursuant to Rule 37, F.R.Civ.P., for an order compelling defendant’s patent litigation counsel, Samuel M. Mims, Jr., to answer certain questions which he refused to answer upon the taking of his deposition by plaintiff, and (2) pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., for inspection and copying of certain documents. Defendant cross-moves, pursuant to Rule 30(b) and (d), to stay all discovery until disposition of defendant’s pending motion for an order transferring this action, on grounds of convenience, to the Northern District of Texas, except for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- City of Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- Hachette Distribution, Inc. v. Hudson County News Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Garfinkle v. Arcata National Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Xerox Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.