Legal Opinion
Garfinkle v. Arcata National Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 10, 1974No. 72 Civ. 5344PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
OPINION
At a pretrial conference held on May 23, plaintiffs were granted leave to bring *689on an oral motion for production of various documents. Memoranda and correspondence have now been submitted, and the matter is readied for determination.
The disputed documents relate to plaintiffs’ first claim for relief and the answer thereto. In essence, plaintiffs allege that pursuant to an agreement with the defendant, Areata National Corporation (“Areata”), in which they sold their interest in several corporations in exchange for shares of the defendant company, Areata…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc., Litton Business Systems, Inc., and Litton Industries Credit Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees- Cross v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Western Electric Company, Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., New York Telephone Company, Inc., New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, the Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Litton Systems, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.