Legal Opinion
Rayeski v. Gunstock Area
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 14, 2001No. 99-305PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The plaintiff, Jonathan Rayeski, appeals the Superior Court’s (Smukler, J.) order granting the defendant’s, Gunstock Area/Gunstock Area Commission, motion to dismiss. We affirm.
The plaintiff’s amended writ of summons alleged that at approximately 4:30 p.m. on or about January 8, 1997, while skiing at the Gunstock Recreation Area, he struck a light pole used for night skiing and was injured as a result of the defendant’s failures to (1) maintain its trails properly and safely, specifically by failing to pad the light pole and (2) make the light pole visible under all foreseeable circumstances.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. SterndaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Williams v. O'BrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Nutbrown v. Mount Cranmore, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Provencal v. Vermont Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jagger v. Mohawk Mountain Ski Area, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Berry v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Diana Camire v. The Gunstock Area CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Cecere v. Loon Mountain Recreation Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Sweeney v. Ragged Mountain Ski Area, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.