Williams v. O'Brien
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
In this interlocutory appeal, we must determine whether a driver who signals the operator of another motor vehicle to proceed has undertaken a duty of care to other motorists on the roadway. Absent special circumstances, no such duty exists. The mere act of signaling does not, by itself, create a duty to insure the safety of other operators on the highway. However, if the signaling driver knows or should know of special circumstances which create, or could reasonably create, a foreseeable risk of harm to third-party operators on the roadway, then a legal duty to exercise reasonable care…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walls v. Oxford Management Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Devine v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- Manchenton v. Auto Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Askew by Askew v. ZellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tessier v. RockefellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Bruzga v. PMR Architects, P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Hungerford v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.