Legal Opinion

Williams v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1995No. 95-236PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

In this interlocutory appeal, we must determine whether a driver who signals the operator of another motor vehicle to proceed has undertaken a duty of care to other motorists on the roadway. Absent special circumstances, no such duty exists. The mere act of signaling does not, by itself, create a duty to insure the safety of other operators on the highway. However, if the signaling driver knows or should know of special circumstances which create, or could reasonably create, a foreseeable risk of harm to third-party operators on the roadway, then a legal duty to exercise reasonable care…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walls v. Oxford Management Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Devine v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Manchenton v. Auto Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. Askew by Askew v. ZellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tessier v. RockefellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  3. Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Bruzga v. PMR Architects, P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Hungerford v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API