Legal Opinion
Sweeney v. Ragged Mountain Ski Area, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 15, 2004No. 2003-719PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The plaintiff, Alaina Sweeney, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) granting a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant, Ragged Mountain Ski Area, Inc. (Ragged Mountain). We reverse and remand.
The relevant facts follow. On March 21, 2001, the plaintiff went snow tubing at Ragged Mountain, which operates, among other things, snow tube runs. The snow tube area was designated only for snow tubing, and was not used for alpine or nordic skiing. When the plaintiff went snow tubing, no employees of Ragged Mountain were present to instruct her on the proper use of the snow tube.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Randi Beth Berniger v. Meadow Green-Wildcat Corp., D/B/A Wildcat MountainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Nutbrown v. Mount Cranmore, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. CreteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Rayeski v. Gunstock AreaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kenison v. DuboisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Estate of Gordon-Couture v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Soraghan v. Mt. Cranmore Ski Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. Elementis Chemical, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Cecere v. Loon Mountain Recreation Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.