Legal Opinion

Provencal v. Vermont Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 9, 1990No. 89-162PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The Superior Court (Perkins, J.) granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss this contract action brought to enforce an offer of settlement. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting the motion because her pleadings demonstrated the existence of genuine issues of material fact warranting a hearing on the merits. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On August 26, 1981, the plaintiff, Theresa Provencal, was allegedly injured in a fall while on the property of Albert and Victoria Mesropian in Laconia. The Mesropians were insured by Vermont Mutual Insurance Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Chasan v. Village District of EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. Rounds v. Standex InternationalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Royer Foundry & MacHine Co. v. New Hampshire Grey Iron, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Belcher v. PaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Poland v. TwomeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Williams v. O'BrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Witte v. DesmaraisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. DiFruscia v. New Hampshire Department of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API