Legal Opinion

Mercer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2018No. SD 35133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, P.J.

Richard S. Mercer ("Movant") brings one point on appeal charging clear error in the motion court's denial, without a hearing, of his amended motion for DNA testing pursuant to § 547.035.1 Finding no merit in this contention, we affirm.

Governing Law and Standard of Review

Since 2001, Missouri has provided a statutory post-conviction remedy to permit an inmate to obtain DNA testing. "In order for a person in custody of the department of corrections to receive DNA testing, he or she must file a motion alleging circumstances that, if substantiated, would demonstrate the person's innocence." Hudson…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Boyd v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Garris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. Lattimer v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. RuffSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API